GCSE Maths Foundation · AQA · Ratio
Ratio to a fraction: why won : lost = 5 : 9 is 5/14, not 5/9
Ratio-to-fraction questions trip students who put one part over the other part. Asked for the fraction of games won when won : lost = , they answer — won over lost — instead of won over the whole. But a fraction is part over whole, and the whole is not 9; it is everyone: games, so the fraction won is .
The thirty-second fix: add the ratio parts to get the whole, then put the part over that whole. If the denominator is just one of the ratio numbers, you measured the part against a part, not against everyone — so gives , never .
Already know this is your gap? Skip the diagnostic and jump straight into the targeted lesson.
How to spot it in your own work
- You put one part over the other part — writing instead of .
- Your denominator is just one of the ratio numbers, not the total of all the parts.
- Your fraction came out bigger than 1 — like for green : red — even though a part of the whole can never be more than everything.
- With a three-part ratio you put the first part over the rest — writing instead of .
- You read a ratio number straight as a percentage — saying boys are for instead of .
An exam question that triggers it
Here is the canonical AQA Foundation trigger (Jun24 P1 Q13b shape, non-calculator):
The ratio of games won to games lost is 5 : 9. What fraction of the games were won?
The misconception answer is — won over lost. But that measures the wins against the losses, not against all the games.
Add the parts to get the whole: games, so the fraction won is .
Why students fall for this
A ratio gives two numbers side by side, and the most visible way to make a fraction from two numbers is to stack one on the other — so won : lost = becomes . But the bottom of a fraction is the whole, everyone, and 9 is only the games lost — a part. The whole is the sum of the parts: , so the fraction won is . The giveaway is the size: a fraction of a part can never exceed 1, so an answer like for green : red must be wrong.
The same slip grows with a three-part ratio, where students put the first part over the rest: lemon : lime : orange = becomes instead of . The whole still includes the part you are asking about, so the denominator is .
A close cousin reads a ratio number straight as a percentage — boys : girls = read as “9% are boys”. You must find the fraction of the whole first, , then convert: . AQA Foundation papers exploit every face — won : lost = 5 : 9 (Jun24 P1 Q13b), glasses 3 : 8 (Jun24 P3 Q17b), and green : red 4 : 3 (Jun23 P2 Q10b).
The fix: A fraction is part over the whole, and the whole is the sum of the ratio parts
Add the parts to get the whole. For won : lost = , the whole is , so the fraction won is — never .
It works for any number of parts. The whole always includes the part you are asking about: totals , so the first part is , not .
A ratio number is not a percentage. For the boys are of the class — find the fraction of the whole first, then convert.
Worked example
In a class, glasses : no glasses = 3 : 8. What fraction wear glasses?
- Add the parts to get the whole. Everyone in the class is parts.
- Put the part over the whole.
- Sense-check the size. is less than 1, as a part of the whole must be; the trap measured glasses against the no-glasses group, not against everyone.
The same habit handles green : red = : , so green is and red is — the trap is bigger than 1, which a part can never be. Add the parts, then put the part over the total.
Find out if this is costing you marks
The 10-minute diagnostic checks for this pattern (and four others) using AQA-style GCSE Higher items. Free, no signup, anonymous.
Common questions
- Why can’t I put one ratio part over the other?
Because the bottom of a fraction is the whole — everyone — not another part. For won : lost = the whole is games, so the fraction won is . Writing measures the wins against the losses, a part against a part.
- How do I find the whole when there are three parts?
Add every part. For lemon : lime : orange = the whole is , so the fraction that are lemon is . The wrong answer puts lemon over the other parts and forgets the whole includes the lemon too.
- My fraction came out bigger than 1 — what went wrong?
A part of the whole can never be more than the whole, so a fraction bigger than 1 is the tell that the denominator is a part, not the total. green : red = gives green , not . Add the parts: .
- Is 9 : 11 the same as 9% and 11%?
No. A ratio number is not a percentage. For boys : girls = the boys are of the class, which is — and the girls are . Find the fraction of the whole first, then convert.
Related misconceptions
- Sharing in a ratio: divide by the sum of the partsThe same whole — sharing £240 in 1 : 3 divides by 1 + 3 = 4, not by one ratio number, just as a fraction uses the sum of the parts as its denominator.
- Ratio: scale by multiplying, not addingA neighbouring Ratio skill — equivalent ratios multiply or divide both parts by the same factor, never add, before you read off a fraction or share.
- Direct and inverse proportionA close Foundation topic where, as here, the wrong relationship feels right until you check what is really held constant.