GCSE Maths Foundation · AQA · Algebraic manipulation
Combining unlike terms: why 9x + y − 6x + y is 3x + 2y, not 5xy
Algebra simplification questions trip students who treat every number and letter as fair game to combine into a single term. Faced with , a student mashes all four terms together and writes . The same root cause has a second face: asked to factorise , a student multiplies the terms to give instead of pulling out the common factor.
The thirty-second fix: you can only add terms that share exactly the same letters. Sort into one pile per letter (and a pile for plain numbers), add within each pile, and keep different piles separate in the answer — never mash unlike terms into one.
Already know this is your gap? Skip the diagnostic and jump straight into the targeted lesson.
How to spot it in your own work
- You wrote for by combining all four terms into one.
- You wrote when asked to factorise , multiplying the terms together instead of pulling out the common factor.
- You wrote for by reading the second as positive instead of negative.
- You slid a plain number into a letter term, for example turning into .
An exam question that triggers it
Here is the canonical AQA Foundation trigger, the shape of JUN22 Paper 3 Q12a:
Simplify .
The misconception answer is , found by treating all four terms as one combined pile. But -terms and -terms are different kinds of thing and must stay in separate piles.
The correct answer is . The -pile: . The -pile: . Answer: .
Why students fall for this
When a student sees several terms in a row they reach for the most heavily over-practised habit they own: add everything up into one answer. The expression fires the same reflex as , so they squash the numbers (, then add the stray s) and glue the letters on, producing . The arithmetic on the digits is right; the reading of the letters is wrong. Different letters represent different unknown quantities — and are no more combinable than apples and bananas.
The same flat reading wrecks factorising. Asked for the factorised form of , a student sees two terms and "adds" them in the sense of merging — , glue the letters, . But factorising is the reverse of expanding: find the highest common factor and take it outside a bracket. The mash answer does not expand back to the original expression.
The fix: One pile per letter — collect within each pile, keep piles separate
Collect only like terms: sort into one pile per letter, plus a pile for plain numbers. Add or subtract within each pile. Keep the piles separate in the answer — never merge unlike piles into one term. For : the -pile gives , and the -pile gives , so the answer is .
Factorise by pulling the common factor out — the reverse of expanding. For : the highest common factor of and is , so . Check by expanding: and . Never multiply the terms together.
Worked example
Simplify .
- Sort the x-terms into one pile. and are like terms (same letter). .
- Sort the y-terms into a second pile. and are like terms. .
- Write the answer with both piles separate.
The trap answer comes from treating all four terms as one pile. and are unlike terms — they represent different unknowns and stay in separate piles.
Find out if this is costing you marks
The 10-minute diagnostic checks for this pattern (and four others) using AQA-style GCSE Higher items. Free, no signup, anonymous.
Common questions
- How do I simplify an expression with two different letters?
Sort into one pile per letter. For : the -pile is , and the -pile is . Answer: . Never merge the two piles into .
- Why isn't equal to when factorised?
Because is a multiplication of the two terms, not a factorisation. Factorising means pulling a common factor outside a bracket: . Check by expanding: and . The product does not expand back to .
- Why is the answer 2a + 11c, not 4a + 11c, for 3a + 5c − a + 6c?
The second -term is , not . A single on its own is , so the -pile is , not . Always carry the sign in front of a term into its pile.
- Can plain numbers combine with letter terms?
No — plain numbers and letter terms are unlike. In : the -pile is , and the numbers-pile is , giving . The and never join the -pile to make .
Related misconceptions
- Expanding brackets: multiplying by the first term onlyThe outside factor must multiply every term inside — the same care with each separate term that collecting like terms demands.
- Fraction of an amount: why 2/5 of 1020 is 408, not 40A related reading error: treating an instruction as a label to copy, instead of an operation to apply to each part.
- Function machines: why 12 → [−4] → [×5] is 40, not −8Another spot where reading the structure of an expression — sequence of operations — matters as much as the arithmetic.