GCSE Maths Foundation

GCSE Maths Foundation · AQA · Transformations & vectors

Column vectors and reversing: reversing (−3, 7) gives (3, −7)

Asked to reverse the vector (3, 7)(-3,\ 7), students swap the two numbers and write (7, −3). But reversing a vector just points it the opposite way, which negates each component where it sits: the top 3-3 becomes 33 and the bottom 77 becomes 7-7, giving (3, −7).

The thirty-second fix: reversing a vector negates each component in place — flip the signs, never swap the rows. A column vector is two stacked components, a horizontal step over a vertical step, not a fraction. So (3, 7)(-3,\ 7) reversed is (3, 7)(3,\ -7).

Already know this is your gap? Skip the diagnostic and jump straight into the targeted lesson.

How to spot it in your own work

  • You swapped the top and bottom numbers when reversing, e.g. turning (3, 7)(-3,\ 7) into (7, 3)(7,\ -3) instead of (3, 7)(3,\ -7).
  • You negated only one component, leaving a vector that still points partly the original way.
  • You treated the column vector as a fraction, e.g. writing 76\tfrac76 for an addition instead of the stacked components (5, 8)(5,\ 8).
  • You wrote the answer as a coordinate of a point rather than as the components of a column vector.

An exam question that triggers it

Here is a canonical AQA Foundation trigger (reverse a column vector):

The vector that maps A to B is

(3, 7).(-3,\ 7).

Write down the column vector that maps B to A.

The misconception is to swap the numbers and write (7, 3)(7,\ -3). But going from B back to A is the same journey reversed, so each step turns around: the horizontal and vertical components keep their positions and only change sign.

Negate each component in place: 33-3 \to 3 and 777 \to -7, giving the column vector (3, 7)(3,\ -7).

Why students fall for this

A column vector looks like two numbers stacked in brackets, and that layout invites two slips. The first is to “reverse” by turning the stack upside down, swapping top and bottom to get (7, 3)(7,\ -3). But the top number is the horizontal step and the bottom is the vertical step; they are not interchangeable, and swapping them describes a completely different journey.

Thinking about direction fixes it. Reversing a vector means walking the same path backwards, so every step turns around: 3 left becomes 3 right, 7 up becomes 7 down. Each component keeps its row and only changes sign. So (3, 7)(-3,\ 7) reversed is (3, 7)(3,\ -7). The diagram below shows the original arrow from A to B and its reverse from B to A sitting on top of it, pointing the opposite way.

The second slip is to read the bracket as a fraction. Adding (1, 2)(1,\ 2) and (4, 6)(4,\ 6) tempts a student to combine across the line and write 76\tfrac76. But the components never mix: add tops to tops and bottoms to bottoms, so 1+4=51 + 4 = 5 over 2+6=82 + 6 = 8, giving the column vector (5, 8)(5,\ 8).

Reversing the vector gives B to A as three, negative seven(−3, 7)(3, −7)AB

The fix: Reverse by negating each component in place — never swap the rows

Flip the signs, keep the positions. Reversing a vector negates the top and the bottom where they sit. For (3, 7)(-3,\ 7): 33-3 \to 3 on top and 777 \to -7 below, giving (3, 7)(3,\ -7).

Don't swap the rows. The top is the horizontal step and the bottom is the vertical step. Swapping them gives (7, 3)(7,\ -3), a different vector that points a different way.

Add and subtract row by row. A column vector is not a fraction. To add (1, 2)(1,\ 2) and (4, 6)(4,\ 6), add tops then bottoms: 1+4=51 + 4 = 5 and 2+6=82 + 6 = 8, so the sum is (5, 8)(5,\ 8) — not 76\tfrac76.

Write it as a column vector. Give the answer as two stacked components, not as a point's coordinates or a fraction. Reversing (3, 7)(-3,\ 7) is the column vector (3, 7)(3,\ -7).

Worked example

Reverse the vector (3, 7)(-3,\ 7), then add (1, 2)(1,\ 2) and (4, 6)(4,\ 6). The trap is to swap rows or merge them into a fraction; the fix is to work component by component.

  1. Negate each component to reverse. Flip the sign of the top and of the bottom, keeping their rows.
    (3, 7)    (3, 7)(-3,\ 7) \;\longrightarrow\; (3,\ -7)
  2. Reject the swap. Swapping rows gives (7, 3)(7,\ -3), which moves 7 right and 3 down — a different journey from the 3 right and 7 down of the true reverse.
  3. Add row by row. Tops to tops, bottoms to bottoms.
    (1, 2)+(4, 6)=(1+4,  2+6)=(5, 8)(1,\ 2) + (4,\ 6) = (1 + 4,\ \ 2 + 6) = (5,\ 8)
  4. Don't make a fraction. The bracket is two stacked components, so the answer is the column vector (5, 8)(5,\ 8) — never 76\tfrac76.

So (3, 7)(-3,\ 7) reversed is (3, 7)(3,\ -7) (negate in place, not (7, 3)(7,\ -3)), and (1, 2)+(4, 6)=(5, 8)(1,\ 2) + (4,\ 6) = (5,\ 8), each component handled on its own row.

Find out if this is costing you marks

The 10-minute diagnostic checks for this pattern (and four others) using AQA-style GCSE Higher items. Free, no signup, anonymous.

Common questions

What is the vector (3, 7)(-3,\ 7) reversed?

It is (3, 7)(3,\ -7). Reversing a vector points it the opposite way, which negates each component in place: the top 3-3 becomes 33 and the bottom 77 becomes 7-7. The components stay in the same positions, top and bottom; only their signs flip. Answering (7, 3)(7,\ -3) swaps the two numbers instead of negating them, which is a different vector entirely.

How do you add two column vectors like (1, 2)(1,\ 2) and (4, 6)(4,\ 6)?

Add the top numbers together and the bottom numbers together, keeping them stacked. For (1, 2)+(4, 6)(1,\ 2) + (4,\ 6), the top is 1+4=51 + 4 = 5 and the bottom is 2+6=82 + 6 = 8, so the sum is (5, 8)(5,\ 8). A column vector is two separate components stacked vertically, not a fraction, so you never combine the numbers across the line. The answer is the column vector (5, 8)(5,\ 8).

Why is (3, 7)(3,\ -7) not the same as (7, 3)(7,\ -3)?

Because the top and bottom of a column vector mean different things: the top is the horizontal step and the bottom is the vertical step. (3, 7)(3,\ -7) moves 3 right and 7 down, while (7, 3)(7,\ -3) moves 7 right and 3 down — quite different journeys that end at different points. Reversing a vector flips the signs in place; it never swaps the rows. Swapping the components changes the direction and length, so it is a genuinely different vector.

Related misconceptions

  • Reflecting in the given lineThe neighbouring transformations skill: the named line is the fold, so (4, −1) reflected in x = 6 is (8, −1), not a reflection in an axis.
  • Enlargement and scale factorThe neighbouring transformations skill: enlarging multiplies every length by the scale factor, so a base of 6 enlarged by ⅓ becomes 2, not 8 or 18.

← All GCSE Maths Higher misconceptions

Column vectors and reversing: reversing (−3, 7) gives (3, −7), not (7, −3) | GCSE Maths Foundation